We have a lot of reasons behind our decision, in spite of the initial sticker shock and the overwelmingly bad experience we had with crazy head-trainer lady. Dan was able to work out a better deal for us- especially with the initiation fee, which helped give me the extra push I needed. When I broke it down it actually is the same price as the YWCA for us both to train, but we get a lot more. It's the same price because we can both train for the same price- as long as we both go to the same session. It's actually kinda cool working out together in that setting because it adds a competition element which y'all know I am all about.
And I'm not gonna lie- it's nice being told I am better than my husband in something :-P
So part of the extra element is full body evaluations which include strength and flexibility tests, monthly weigh ins, measurements, and body fat %. This is when reality reared it's ugly head and I realized that I still wanted a trainer. I may not need a trainer based on the level of my knowledge, but I need the continued motivation a trainer provides. I enjoy getting pushed to and then past my limits. The reality is- I like having a trainer and I simply do better with one. This was proven immediately as soon as I started working out with Emily- I'm hoping I get another surge with my new trainer, Upinder. Yes, hard name- but very nice guy and he is going to school for nursing. I definitely could use somebody with a medical background to help with my constant injury issues. lol
And apparently, I need some extra help because my body fat % as of Monday is 30.4%! Below is the rating system that LA Fitness uses. According to it I fall in the "risky" category. Frustrating after all my hard work!!
Female Body Fat Rating Scale
Age | RISKY | EXCELLENT | GOOD | FAIR | POOR | RISKY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19-24 | <9% | 18.9% | 22.1% | 25.0% | 29.6% | >29.6% |
25-29 | 18.9% | 22.0% | 25.4% | 29.8% | ||
30-34 | 19.7% | 22.7% | 26.4% | 30.5% | ||
35-39 | 21.0% | 24.0% | 27.7% | 31.5% | ||
40-44 | 22.6% | 25.6% | 29.3% | 32.8% | ||
45-49 | 24.3% | 27.3% | 30.9% | 34.1% | ||
50-54 | 26.6% | 29.7% | 33.1% | 36.2% | ||
55-59 | 27.4% | 30.7% | 34.0% | 37.3% | ||
60+ | 27.6% | 31.0% | 34.4% | 38.0% |
I gotta admit, though- I am confused because I've seen some other classifications as well, mainly this one below.
So, according to one, I am risky, according to another I am average.... Well, in the end Dan set a goal of being in the low 20s, which he thinks is reasonable for me.
What do you think is a better indication of health- body fat % or BMI?
Well, neither in your case because you rock and are a beacon of good health! The doctors at the hospital said so. :-)
ReplyDeletep.s. - You're better than me at a lot of things, silly bear!